YMCA National Swimming and Diving YMCA National Swimming and Diving HEALTHY COMPETITION
SKILLS FOR LIFE


National YMCA Competitive Swimming And Diving

Information For The YMCA Competitive Swim Community
 

Quick Links:  Home     Discussion Forum      Officials      Trainers     

  Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Rules and Officials
 YMCA of the USA Competitive Swimming and Diving Fo :YMCA of the USA Competitive Swimming - General :Rules and Officials
Message Icon Topic: Time discrepancy Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
mandy52799
New Member
New Member


Joined: Jan/19/2011
Location: United States
Posts: 3
Quote mandy52799 Replybullet Topic: Time discrepancy
    Posted: Jan/22/2011 at 6:49pm

Alright here's the scenario:

We had a swimmer in the 25 butterfly (so watch times only,) whose times were listed as 22.03 and 22.79. Qualifying time is a 22.59. Now under normal circumstances, these two times would be averages and they would come up with a qualifying time. The coach, however, wants to throw the time out. I find this totally unfair to the 8 year old swimmer who has no control over why the timers pushed their buttons at different times. We always say benefit of the doubt goes to the swimmer, so why wouldn't that apply here? Is there a rule that I can show the coach to allow the swimmer to keep their time?
IP IP Logged
Ed Miller
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Moderator - Officials

Joined: Apr/29/2006
Location: United States
Posts: 159
Quote Ed Miller Replybullet Posted: Jan/31/2011 at 6:17pm
Under the USA-S  technical rules (Rule102.16.5.B(3)), if only two watch times are available, , the time shall be the average of those two watch times.  It may well be that the coach also took a watch time and his time  supported the slower time, or other swimmers finished ahead of this swimmer in the heat with slower times, in which case he is trying to be fair to all the swimmers and not let one swimmer qualify based on a suspect time when others who swam faster do not qualify.  You should really talk with the coach and find out his reasons for his decision.
 
Ed Miller
National Officials' Committee Chair
IP IP Logged
mandy52799
New Member
New Member


Joined: Jan/19/2011
Location: United States
Posts: 3
Quote mandy52799 Replybullet Posted: Jan/31/2011 at 7:37pm
I've discussed this particular case with the coach ad naseum. Its not a matter of putting another swimmer at a disadvantage. This swimmer came in first place (We had 4 officials place judging.) The second place swimmer swam a time of 23.12 so there really isn't anything suspect with that part of it. It basically comes down to one of the timers made an error.
 
I find myself at a loss with this situation because I had already pointed out to the coach the rule you cited above. She is still opting to toss the time like it never happened. I guess at this point I wonder why we are even here as officials if the rules aren't going to be applied. I'm at a total loss as to what to do here.
IP IP Logged
Ed Miller
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Moderator - Officials

Joined: Apr/29/2006
Location: United States
Posts: 159
Quote Ed Miller Replybullet Posted: Jan/31/2011 at 8:44pm
What reason did the coach give for deciding that the time is not valid?  Did the coach time the swimmer and get a time closer to the higher time.  Even though the swimmer came in first, did the swimmer finish a full second faster than the next swimmer, or was it a very close finish?  Not being there, I cannot comment on those issues.  I don't know why your coach doesn't want to accept your swimmer's time, but there must be something there because coaches don't just throw out times.  The rule is what it is, but the coach must have a reason for not wanting to accept the time.  That has to be between you and your coach.
 
Ed Miller
National Officials' Committee Chair 
IP IP Logged
mandy52799
New Member
New Member


Joined: Jan/19/2011
Location: United States
Posts: 3
Quote mandy52799 Replybullet Posted: Jan/31/2011 at 9:39pm
Her reasoning was that there was such a difference in the two watch times, so she claims it couldn't possibly be a valid time.
 
As far as if there was a full second between the swimmers, I can't say since I didn't have a watch in my hand, but I was place judging and it wasn't close.
IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.06
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.