Active TopicsActive Topics  Display List of Forum MembersMemberlist  CalendarCalendar  Search The ForumSearch  HelpHelp
  RegisterRegister  LoginLogin
Rules and Officials
 YMCA of the USA Competitive Swimming and Diving Fo :YMCA of the USA Competitive Swimming - General :Rules and Officials
Message Icon Topic: Modified Ballot System Post Reply Post New Topic
Author Message
mtbahs
Active Member
Active Member


Joined: Dec/06/2007
Location: United States
Posts: 12
Quote mtbahs Replybullet Topic: Modified Ballot System
    Posted: Dec/06/2007 at 3:37pm
The rules reference a modified ballot system for determining places however, I can't find any place that explains how this is used and how the places are calculated.  Any ideas??? 
 
Thanks!
IP IP Logged
Ed Miller
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Moderator - Officials

Joined: Apr/29/2006
Location: United States
Posts: 131
Quote Ed Miller Replybullet Posted: Dec/13/2007 at 4:10pm
With the proliferation of electronic judging and timing systems, the guidance on using the modified ballot system has been left out of the rulebooks for a number of years, but we still need to use it at times, as you have found out.
 
The Level I and Level II Swim Officials' Clinic Designs contain materials on how the system is used and when it must be used.  You might talk with  your local Swim Officials' Trainer and get a copy of the materials.
 
Basically, when semi-automatic (buttons) or manual (watches) timing is the primary timing system, then the observations of the finish judges determine the order of finish.  If the two judges agree, that is the order of finish.
 
If the judges disagree, then you must use the modified ballot system to determine the order of finish.  In the modified ballot system, and only for purposes of the determination of the order of finish, each judge's order of finish and the order of finish determined by the times are assigned points, with 1 point assigned to a lane for a first place finish, 2 points for a second place finish, 3 points for a third place finish and so forth.  For example, if Judge 1 had Lane 3 finishing first and Lane 4 finishing second, Lane 3 would be assigned one point for that judge's first place finish and Lane 4 would be assigned 2 points for a second place finish.  If Judge 2 had Lane 4 finishing first and Lane 3 finishing second, then Lane 4 would be assigned one point and Lane 3 would be assigned 2 points.  If based on the times, Lane 3 finished first and Lane 4 finished second, Lane 3 would be assigned 1 point and Lane 4 would be assigned 2 points.  You would then add up the points from the two judges and the times and the lowest point total would be the winner, in this case Lane 3.  That was a simple example with only two lanes, but if you had swimmers in eight lanes, you would do the same way for all eight lanes. 
 
Once you determined the order of finish, then the points would be awarded for each place finish for scoring purposes.  For example, if you were running a dual meet using 5-3-1 scoring (with 5 points for first place, 3 points for second place and 1 point for third place), then in our example above, Lane 3 would be awarded 5 points for scoring purposes and Lane 4 would be awarded 3 points, with no points awarded for third place because there were only two swimmers.
 
Hope that helps.
 
Ed Miller
National Officials' Committee Chairman
IP IP Logged
jackieparts
New Member
New Member


Joined: Nov/07/2009
Location: United States
Posts: 1
Quote jackieparts Replybullet Posted: Nov/07/2009 at 10:18pm
What happens in the event of a tie, do the points for the two places get added together and divided between the places similar to what is done in scoring with points?
IP IP Logged
Ed Miller
Moderator Group
Moderator Group

Moderator - Officials

Joined: Apr/29/2006
Location: United States
Posts: 131
Quote Ed Miller Replybullet Posted: Nov/24/2009 at 1:55pm

If application of the modified ballot stystem results in a tie, the points for the two places in contention are added together and split, just as they would be in any tie resulting from the use of automatic timing systems.

 

Ed Miller, National Officials' Committee Chair

IP IP Logged
Post Reply Post New Topic
Printable version Printable version

Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot create polls in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums version 8.06
Copyright ©2001-2006 Web Wiz Guide

This page was generated in 0.143 seconds.